Papers with multi-hop QA task

7 papers
Time Sensitive Knowledge Editing through Efficient Finetuning (2024.acl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing locate-and-edit knowledge editing methods suffer from two limitations: they are infeasible for large scale KE in practice and require long run-time.
Approach: They propose to use parametric fine-tuning techniques to update obsolete knowledge and induce new knowledge into LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed methods improve the performance of KE and knowledge update in a temporal dataset with knowledge update and knowledge injection examples.
Analyzing the Effectiveness of the Underlying Reasoning Tasks in Multi-hop Question Answering (2023.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have utilized underlying reasoning (UR) tasks in multi-hop question answering datasets to explain the predicted answers and evaluate models' reasoning abilities.
Approach: They analyze UR tasks in QA datasets to determine their effectiveness . they find that UR task is helpful in preventing reasoning shortcuts .
Outcome: The proposed model improves QA performance, reasoning shortcuts, and robustness on adversarial questions.
Prompt-based Conservation Learning for Multi-hop Question Answering (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing multi-hop QA methods fail to answer a large fraction of sub-questions even if their parent questions are answered correctly.
Approach: They propose a Prompt-based Conservation Learning framework that acquires new knowledge from multi-hop QA tasks while conserving old knowledge learned on single-hop tasks.
Outcome: The proposed framework acquires new knowledge from multi-hop QA tasks while conserving old knowledge learned on single-hop tasks, mitigating forgetting.
BELLE: A Bi-Level Multi-Agent Reasoning Framework for Multi-Hop Question Answering (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on multi-hop question answering employ specific methods regardless of question types . complexity of multihop question answerrs often exceeds knowledge boundaries of LLMs .
Approach: They propose a framework that uses chain-of-thought prompting to prompt LLMs to answer multi-hop questions.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms baseline models in multi-hop QA scenarios.
DRAMA: Dynamic Multi-Granularity Graph Estimate Retrieval over Tabular and Textual Question Answering (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: TableTextQA tasks require tabular and textual data, gaining increasing attention . however, row-based approaches suffer from limitations such as lack of interaction between rows .
Approach: They propose a method that incorporates an interaction mechanism among multiple rows . Empirical results demonstrate that the proposed method is effective .
Outcome: Empirical results show that the proposed model is effective on tabFact and HybridQA datasets.
Retrieval Heads are Dynamic (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have identified "retrieval heads" in Large Language Models responsible for extracting information from input contexts.
Approach: They propose to examine retrieval heads from a dynamic perspective . they establish that retrieval head activation is highly dynamic and functionally irreplaceable .
Outcome: The proposed model's hidden state encodes a predictive signal for future retrieval head patterns, indicating an internal planning mechanism.
More Documents, Same Length: Isolating the Challenge of Multiple Documents in RAG (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances the accuracy of Large Language Models by leveraging relevant external documents during generation.
Approach: They evaluate various language models on custom datasets derived from QA tasks . they keep context length and position of relevant information constant while varying the number of documents .
Outcome: The proposed method improves the accuracy of large language models by leveraging external documents . increasing document count reduces performance by up to 20%, the authors find .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations